Woolacombe and Saunton at 12:44 BST, 31 August 1940

Four Luftwaffe photos, timed to the minute, set against today's tide, LiDAR and satellites

Modern base

Tide on 31 August 1940

Predicted tide in BST, metres relative to Ordnance Datum Newlyn, at 1940 mean sea level and without surge. Dots mark the photos; tap one to zoom to it.

Tap a footprint or a dot on the tide chart.

Waterline timeline 1985–2026

Each dot is one Landsat or Sentinel-2 image taken at the same point in the tide cycle as the 1940 photos: 70–110 minutes after low water on a rising tide, with a tide range within 1.5 m of 1940’s (Ilfracombe range 6.8 m, a mid-range tide between springs and neaps). The value is the LiDAR height at the detected water edge minus the predicted tide, so 0 means the water was exactly where the tide model said. The star is the 1940 photo at the north end of Woolacombe Sand.

What this is

On 31 August 1940 a German reconnaissance plane photographed the North Devon coast. Each photo shows the camera's clock, so we know the minute each was taken. This site shows the four photos that cover Woolacombe Sand, Croyde and Saunton Sands. They were taken between about 12:44 and 12:46 BST, roughly 90 minutes after low water, with the tide coming in.

This is a small side project. It grew out of looking for the Ramson Cliff erratic on the 1940 photos.

The question: has the sea moved since 1940? Tide gauges show sea level has risen about 20 cm since then. These photos let us see what that means on real beaches.

What is compared with what

How the photos are fitted to the ground

The camera was not pointing straight down: it was tilted about 12° to the west-south-west, from about 8 km up. For each photo we worked out the camera's position and tilt, laid each photo over the LiDAR ground surface, and pinned it to thousands of fixed features that are still there, such as roads, field corners and buildings. Tested on points left out of the fit, these photos sit within about 3–5 m (about 10 m among the Saunton dunes). Along Marine Drive at Woolacombe, the 1940 road lies within 3 m of today's road.

Why the same tide height isn't enough

It is tempting to compare 1940 with any modern image taken when the tide was at the same height. That is not enough. A Sentinel-2 image from 27 September 2018 caught the sea at almost exactly the 1940 height, but the tide was falling, 100 minutes before low water, on a big spring tide (range 8.3 m). In 1940 the tide was rising, about 90 minutes after low water, on a mid-sized tide (range 6.8 m).

On a flat beach like Woolacombe, that matters. A falling tide leaves wet sand and pools behind it, so the edge you see from the air lags the true water level. A rising tide pushes in over drier sand. Bigger tides move faster and push waves further up the beach. Any of these can shift the visible water's edge by more than the 8 m or so that 20 cm of sea-level rise would cause.

So every modern image here is matched on all three: the same time after low water (within 20 minutes), the same direction (rising) and a similar tide range (within 1.5 m). Only then do we look at height. Of 106 Landsat and Sentinel-2 readings from 1985–2023, 27 pass. On those, the water's edge sits a median of −0.08 m from the predicted tide at Woolacombe (13 readings) and +0.16 m at Saunton (14). Neither shows a trend that stands out from the noise: +2.2 ± 5.0 and −7.8 ± 5.1 mm a year.

Matching the phase makes the comparison fair, but it still can't show the 20 cm rise. Waves, wet sand and moving beaches are bigger than the signal. The rise itself is measured by tide gauges.

What it can and can't show

Bottom line: the rise is measured by tide gauges such as Newlyn. The photos show what the coast looked like: on these sandy beaches the rise is lost among the beach's own changes.

Method details

Sources, credits and licences